3 free agent pitchers the Angels should’ve signed instead of Tyler Anderson

Los Angeles Angels v Chicago White Sox
Los Angeles Angels v Chicago White Sox / Quinn Harris/GettyImages
1 of 2
Next

The Los Angeles Angels made one of the first free agent signings of the offseason, inking Tyler Anderson on a three-year deal worth $39 million. At the time of the deal, this felt like a steal for Perry Minasian and the Angels.

Anderson had come off of a career year with the Dodgers and while it was unrealistic to expect him to be that sub-3.00 ERA pitcher he was in 2022, I did expect Anderson to be a quality innings eater - something this team lacked last season, and has lacked so far this season. Unfortunately, Anderson has been anything but quality.

Anderson had. been pitching better of late posting a 3.14 ERA in his last five starts, but after his latest disastrous outing in Chicago against the White Sox, His ERA sits at an ugly 5.47. He was twice handed leads, and each time gave them back instantly. Simply put, he's been nothing close to what we expected. His struggles have Angels fans wondering what if? These pitchers in similar tiers would've been better additions.

1) The LA Angels should've signed Nathan Eovaldi instead of Tyler Anderson

Nathan Eovaldi is an arm many Angels fans wanted, and saw walk over to a division rival. Eovaldi signed a two-year deal worth $34 million in a deal that can go up to three years for $63 million if he reaches his incentives. While this is slightly more AAV than Anderson got, the total dollar value wasn't as steep as the $39 million Anderson got, and Eovaldi got only two guaranteed years.

This deal did come with risk as he's dealt with injuries over the course of his career, but Eovaldi has been healthy and dominant for his hometown team.

In 11 starts, the right-hander is 7-2 with a 2.42 ERA in 74.1 innings of work. He leads the league in innings, while also leading the league with two complete games and one shutout. He doesn't walk anybody (1.7 BB/9) and he doesn't allow home runs (0.4 HR/9). He's been a lot of what Anderson was last season as a guy who limited mistakes with free passes and longballs, and a guy who can eat innings.

Eovaldi had a three-start stretch in which he pitched 25,2 scoreless innings, allowing just 11 hits and three walks to go along with 25 strikeouts. This included a complete game shutout against the Yankees, eight scoreless innings in Anaheim, and falling one out shy of a complete game shutout in Oakland. So yes, he was four outs shy of three straight complete game shutouts.

After allowing three runs in seven innings against the Braves, he delivered another complete game, allowing just one run in Pittsburgh. So yes, Eovaldi has been utterly dominant for Texas and is a huge reason they're in first place in the AL West.

2) The LA Angels should've signed Chris Bassitt instead of Tyler Anderson

This one would involve a little more splurging from Arte Moreno, but Chris Bassitt was my number one target for the Angels to sign in free agency. In terms of just giving consistent length and your team a chance to win every time out, Bassitt is one of the best in the business and has been for years.

Bassitt signed a three-year deal worth $63 million. It's a step up from Anderson's deal for sure, but it's not completely out of range. While Bassitt has had a couple of clunkers for Toronto this season, his other nine starts show how valuable he would've been for the Angels.

Bassitt's Toronto career got off to a putrid start, as he allowed nine runs on ten hits in 3.1 innings in St. Louis. His most recent start was putrid, as he allowed seven runs in four innings in Minnesota. The other nine starts in between saw him post a 1.83 ERA in 59 innings of work. This included a six-inning performance against the Angels which saw him allow just two runs.

The veteran right-hander has allowed two earned runs or fewer in eight of his 11 starts. It'd be nice if the Angels had this kind of consistency out of a single one of their starters.

3) The LA Angels should've signed Zach Eflin instead of Tyler Anderson

Is it just the Rays? I'm sure they've played a role, but Zach Eflin has looked a whole lot better than Tyler Anderson has as an Angel.

The former Phillie signed a three-year deal worth $40 million to join the usually cheap Rays. Eflin got $1 million more than Anderson did which seemed curious at the time, but seems to be making perfect sense now.

In his nine starts for the Rays, Eflin has a 3.17 ERA in 54 innings of work. He's allowed three runs or fewer in seven of his nine starts and the Rays have won eight of his nine starts. While these numbers certainly wouldn't have been the same in Anaheim, it's safe to bet they'd be better than Anderson's.

Eflin has always been a serviceable option in the back end of the Phillies rotation, and appears to be hitting his stride pitching in a new environment.

There's obviously no telling how any of these pitchers would've done pitching for the Angels. What we do know is there's a very good chance all three of these pitchers wind up being better than what Anderson has done so far.

manual

Next